THE TERMINAL PRESS

Bold Hochul Immigration Policies Challenge Trump

PUBLISHED:
Bold Hochul Immigration Policies Challenge Trump
FILE PHOTO / John Geralt

Key Takeaways

  • Governor Hochul formally demanded that ICE agent Jonathan Ross be removed from New York unless cleared by an independent investigation.
  • The governor is pursuing a 'two-track approach' involving direct White House outreach and legislative action to counter federal immigration policies.
  • Proposed sanctuary-like measures would prohibit federal deportation warrants in sensitive locations and ban cooperation between local police and ICE.
  • The assertive stance is seen as politically beneficial for Hochul, aligning with strong public sentiment in New York against federal immigration tactics.
  • While lauded by many, some left-leaning lawmakers express concern that the proposed legislative protections might be insufficient.

THE TERMINAL PRESS - Governor Hochul Demands Action on ICE Agent, Pushes Sweeping Immigration Reforms

ALBANY, N.Y. – Governor Kathy Hochul of New York has initiated a significant challenge to federal immigration enforcement, sending a strongly worded letter to former President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, demanding confirmation and action regarding a specific Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent. The governor’s unprecedented outreach centers on Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent reportedly involved in the fatal shooting of Renee Good, and seeks to prevent his deployment in the Empire State without a full, independent investigation.

“If Jonathan Ross has been reassigned to work in New York, I demand that he be immediately removed and not redeployed unless cleared after a full, independent investigation,” Hochul stated in the previously unreported letter. “I have no confidence that Ross can be trusted to safely interact with the public. Nor should you.”

The White House did not offer an immediate response to the governor's letter. This move represents the latest escalation in Hochul’s efforts to establish robust “guardrails” against what she characterizes as potentially destabilizing federal immigration policies, particularly those implemented during the Trump administration. New York is home to an estimated 560,000 undocumented immigrants, making the issue especially pertinent within the state’s borders.

Hochul’s strategy is described as a “two-track approach,” encompassing both direct engagement with federal authorities and anticipated legislative action. This includes recent private meetings, such as one last month with Homan in Albany, where Hochul reportedly urged against similar federal operations in New York City that have led to fatalities elsewhere. The governor emphasized the necessity of accountability for agents involved in controversial incidents, referencing the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti during a Minnesota crackdown, as well as the February death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a blind refugee left by federal agents in Buffalo.

Politically, the assertive stance against federal immigration policies is seen by observers as beneficial for Hochul, particularly as she campaigns for re-election. Public sentiment in New York strongly supports limits on federal immigration tactics; a February Siena University poll revealed that 67 percent of New York voters believe federal immigration tactics had gone too far, and 59 percent opposed an influx of more ICE agents into New York City.

Concurrently, Governor Hochul and Democratic state lawmakers are close to approving a package of sanctuary-like measures. These legislative proposals aim to erect legal barriers around federal immigration enforcement, including prohibitions against federal authorities executing civil deportation warrants in sensitive locations like schools and houses of worship. The measures would also ban formal agreements between agencies such as ICE and local police departments for coordinating operations and sharing equipment. Furthermore, New York is poised to facilitate lawsuits against federal officers should individuals believe their constitutional rights have been violated.

This comprehensive package signals a significant rebuke of federal immigration and deportation policies by a prominent blue state. It also marks an evolution for Governor Hochul, who, as a local official two decades prior, held a more conservative stance on immigration issues, having opposed undocumented immigrants obtaining state driver’s licenses. Despite the broad protective measures, some left-leaning state lawmakers express concern that Hochul’s proposed legislation may not go far enough, specifically regarding a strict ban on local police communicating with federal immigration authorities. One anonymous legislator remarked that the likely agreement could create “an illusion of legal protections while still proactively permitting law enforcement to share info,” potentially leaving undocumented immigrants vulnerable.

TRENDING POSTS